Key result
β-blockers link to ~16% lower mortality in suspected CHD, primarily in patients with high vitamin A.
Why the study?
Whether β-blockers improve longevity in coronary heart disease without HFrEF is uncertain, and vitamin A may modify this association via catecholamine synthesis pathways.
Does β-blocker treatment reduce all-cause mortality in patients with suspected stable angina pectoris?
Cohort (n=4,118)
Does β-blocker treatment reduce all-cause mortality in patients with suspected stable angina pectoris?
Beta-blocker therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with suspected stable angina, an effect that appears modified by serum vitamin A levels.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
β-blockers were associated with lower mortality in suspected stable angina; leaves open vitamin A interaction for prospective trials.
AIMS: Blockade of β-adrenoceptors reduces sympathetic nervous system activity and improves survival in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, any improvement in longevity among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) but without HFrEF remains uncertain. Vitamin A has been linked to the activation of tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the catecholamine synthesis pathway. We investigated if vitamin A status modified the association of β-blocker use with the risk of all-cause mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 4118 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris, of whom the majority had normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were studied. Hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality comparing treatment vs. non-treatment of β-blockers according to the tertiles of serum vitamin A were explored in Cox proportional hazards regression models. During a median follow-up of 10.3 years, 897 patients (21.8%) died. The overall LVEF was 65% and 283 (6.9%) had anamnestic HF. After multivariable adjustments for traditional risk factors, medical history, and drug therapies of cardiovascular disease, β-blocker treatment was inversely associated with the risk of all-cause mortality [HR : 0.84; 95% CI (confidence interval), 0.72-0.97]. However, the inverse association was generally stronger among patients in the upper serum vitamin A tertile (HR :0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.86; Pinteraction = 0.012), which remained present after excluding patients with LVEF < 40%. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected CHD, β-blocker treatment was associated with improved survival primarily among patients with high serum vitamin A levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhar et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=4,118). β-blockers vs. Non-treatment of β-blockers was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97, p=0.012 for interaction). β-blocker treatment was associated with improved survival in suspected CHD (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.97), primarily among patients with high serum vitamin A levels (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.50-0.86).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: