Why the study?
Does left bundle branch pacing improve outcomes compared to biventricular pacing in patients with CRT indications?
Does left bundle branch pacing improve outcomes compared to biventricular pacing in patients with CRT indications?
Left bundle branch pacing is emerging as a viable alternative to traditional biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy, potentially offering superior QRS narrowing and ejection fraction improvement.
Conduction system pacing by positioning a deep septal lead that engages the LBB was first described by Huang et al in 20171. LBBP as it is known today has since been shown to achieve physiological pacing with higher success rates and better pacing parameters compared to His Bundle Pacing2. There is increasing evidence that LBBP is a viable alternative to traditional Biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients with CRT indications. Compared to BVP, LBBP appears to be superior in its ability to narrow QRS duration (QRSd), improve ejection fraction (EF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, reduce end systolic volume, and increase number of super responders3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tay et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: