Key result
QRS transition during lead screwing-in matches dynamic maneuvers for V6-RWPT shortening to mark LBBC.
Why the study?
Gold-standard QRS transition criteria during dynamic manoeuvers are seen in <50% of LBBAP procedures, prompting evaluation of transition observed during lead penetration with interrupted pacemapping.
Can QRS transition from LVSP to ns-LBBP observed during lead screwing-in with interrupted pacemapping confirm left bundle branch capture as effectively as dynamic maneuvers?
Observational (n=104)
No
Can QRS transition from LVSP to ns-LBBP observed during lead screwing-in with interrupted pacemapping confirm left bundle branch capture as effectively as dynamic maneuvers?
Absolute Event Rate: 18.8% vs 17.3%
p-value: p=0.719
A shortening of at least 10 ms in paced V6-RWPT during lead screwing-in with interrupted pacemapping can serve as a reliable marker of left bundle branch capture, comparable to dynamic maneuvers.
May support QRS transition during lead screwing-in as a marker of left bundle branch capture; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background QRS transition criteria during dynamic manoeuvers are the gold-standard for non-invasive confirmation of left bundle branch (LBB) capture, but they are seen in <50% of LBB area pacing (LBBAP) procedures. Objective We hypothesized that transition from left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) to LBB pacing (LBBP), when observed during lead penetration into the deep interventricular septum (IVS) with interrupted pacemapping, can suggest LBB capture. Methods QRS transition during lead screwing-in was defined as shortening of paced V6-R wave peak time (RWPT) by ≥10 ms from LVSP to non-selective LBBP (ns-LBBP) obtained during mid to deep septal lead progression at the same target area, between two consecutive pacing manoeuvres. ECG-based criteria were used to compared LVSP and ns-LBBP morphologies obtained by interrupted pacemapping. Results Sixty patients with demonstrated transition from LVSP to ns-LBBP during dynamic manoeuvers were compared to 44 patients with the same transition during lead screwing-in. Average shortening in paced V6-RWPT was similar among study groups (17.3 ± 6.8 ms vs. 18.8 ± 4.9 ms for transition during dynamic manoeuvres and lead screwing-in, respectively; p = 0.719). Paced V6-RWPT and aVL-RWPT, V6-V1 interpeak interval and the recently described LBBP score, were also similar for ns-LBBP morphologies in both groups. LVSP morphologies showed longer V6-RWPT and aVL-RWPT, shorter V6-V1 interpeak interval and lower LBBP score punctuation, without differences among the two QRS transition groups. V6-RWPT < 75 ms or V6-V1 interpeak interval > 44 ms criterion was more frequently achieved in ns-LBBP morphologies obtained during lead screwing-in compared to those obtained during dynamic manoeuvres (70.5% vs. 50%, respectively p = 0.036). Conclusions During LBBAP procedure, QRS transition from LVSP to ns-LBBP can be observed as the lead penetrates deep into the IVS with interrupted pacemapping. Shortening of at least 10 ms in paced V6-RWPT may serve as marker of LBB capture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Figuero et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Bradycardia and/or heart failure requiring left bundle branch area pacing (n=104). QRS transition during lead screwing-in vs. QRS transition during dynamic manoeuvres was evaluated on Average shortening in paced V6-RWPT (p=0.719). QRS transition during lead screwing-in showed similar shortening in paced V6-RWPT compared to dynamic manoeuvres (18.8 vs 17.3 ms, p=0.719), serving as a marker of left bundle branch capture.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: