Why the study?
Is non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) accurate enough to guide catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia?
Is non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) accurate enough to guide catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia?
ECGI shows promise for guiding non-invasive cardiac radioablation of large target areas but currently lacks the accuracy required for discreet radiofrequency ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ECGI may warrant evaluation for non-invasive radioablation; leaves open its role in guiding discrete RF ablation of VT.
Graham et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: