Retrospective study compares setup errors in pediatric total marrow irradiation using two immobilization techniques, suggesting improved accuracy with VC-TM technique.
Aiming to compare the interfraction setup errors and derived planning target volume (PTV) margins of two immobilization techniques for pediatric total marrow (lymphoid) irradiation (TMI/TMLI), this study evaluated a whole-body vacuum cushion (VC) versus a vacuum cushion combined with a thermoplastic mask system (VC-TM). In this retrospective study, 12 pediatric patients undergoing TMI/TMLI with helical tomotherapy were stratified into VC and VC-TM groups. Daily megavoltage CT (MVCT)-based setup errors in left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were analyzed. Planning target volume (PTV) margins were derived from the observed setup errors. In the VC group, the setup errors were 0.65 [0.30, 1.30] mm (LR), 4.60 ± 3.61 mm (SI), and 1.15 [0.75, 4.28] mm (AP). For the VC-TM group, the setup errors were 0.70 [0.40, 1.40] mm (LR), 2.08 ± 1.36 mm (SI), and 2.06 ± 1.33 mm (AP). With daily MVCT guidance, margins calculated from random errors alone were 2 mm (LR), 4 mm (SI), and 4 mm (AP) for VC group, and 2 mm (LR), 3 mm (SI), and 2 mm (AP) for VC-TM group. Compared with the VC group, the VC-TM group demonstrated superior setup accuracy both at the whole-body level and at local anatomic landmarks, particularly in the SI direction. Both immobilization techniques are feasible for pediatric TMI/TMLI. The VC-TM system provided more stable positioning, especially for the head and neck. Daily MVCT-guided online correction is recommended to utilize this stability and enable a substantial reduction in PTV margins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: