Key result
Baseline GLS ≤15% predicts ~250% higher adverse LV remodeling risk after severe asymptomatic AS replacement.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
The timing of AVR in severe asymptomatic AS is debated, and a predictive model for adverse outcomes after AVR integrating GLS, BNP, and E/E' had not been investigated.
Does a multimodal risk model integrating GLS, BNP, and E/E' predict adverse remodeling and MACE in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=96)
No
Does a multimodal risk model integrating GLS, BNP, and E/E' predict adverse remodeling and MACE in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Odds Ratio: 3.5
Integrating global longitudinal strain, BNP, and diastolic function provides a superior predictive model for adverse left ventricular remodeling and MACE in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement.
Supports GLS monitoring for remodeling risk in asymptomatic AS; hypothesis-generating pending larger prospective validation.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The timing of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) remains debated. Preserved ejection fraction (EF) may mask subclinical dysfunction, while global longitudinal strain (GLS), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and diastolic indices (E/E') provide complementary prognostic information. A predictive model for adverse outcomes after AVR integrating GLS, BNP, and E/E' has not been previously investigated. METHODS Ninety-six patients with severe asymptomatic AS and preserved EF (>50%) undergoing AVR were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months. Echocardiography (GLS, EF, LVMI, IVSd, LVIDd, E/E'), BNP, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Primary endpoint was LV remodeling; secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS Despite preserved EF, 76% had impaired GLS (<15%), and 64% remained in negative remodeling at 6 months. Baseline GLS ≤15% was the only independent predictor of adverse remodeling in multivariable logistic regression (OR 4.7 at 3 months; OR 3.5 at 6 months). For MACE, baseline E/E' >13 was the strongest independent predictor (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.58-7.57, p = 0.004). The integrated GLS-BNP-E/E' model demonstrated superior predictive strength compared with individual parameters, with Nagelkerke R2 values of 0.41 for remodeling and 0.31 for MACE. CONCLUSION A multimodal risk model integrating GLS, BNP, and E/E' predicts adverse remodeling and MACE in severe asymptomatic AS. These findings highlight the complementary role of imaging and biomarkers in risk stratification before AVR-a concept that warrants confirmation in future multicenter studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Šehović et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (n=96). Baseline global longitudinal strain (GLS) ≤15% vs. GLS >15% was evaluated on LV remodeling (OR 3.5). Baseline global longitudinal strain ≤15% independently predicted adverse left ventricular remodeling at 6 months (OR 3.5) in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: