Key result
ABC-stroke score outperforms CHA2DS2-VASc for predicting ischemic stroke in ED patients with acute AF.
Why the study?
The performance of the ABC and CHA2DS2-VASc stroke scores had not been evaluated under real-world conditions in an emergency setting.
Does the ABC-stroke score improve stroke risk stratification compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation in the emergency department?
Cohort (n=2,108)
No
Does the ABC-stroke score improve stroke risk stratification compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation in the emergency department?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.64% vs 0.55%
The ABC-stroke score outperforms the guideline-recommended CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting stroke risk among emergency department patients with acute atrial fibrillation, particularly refining risk in those deemed moderate risk by CHA2DS2-VASc.
May refine ischemic stroke risk stratification with ABC-stroke over CHA2DS2-VASc in ED acute AF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Aims To evaluate the performance of the ABC (Age, Biomarkers, Clinical history) and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc stroke scores under real-world conditions in an emergency setting. Methods and Results The performance of the biomarker-based ABC-stroke score and the clinical variable-based CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score for stroke risk assessment were prospectively evaluated in a consecutive series of 2,108 patients with acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care emergency department. Performance was assessed according to methods for the development and validation of clinical prediction models by Steyerberg et al. and the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis. During a cumulative observation period of 3,686 person-years, the stroke incidence rate was 1.66 per 100 person-years. Overall, the ABC-stroke and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores revealed respective c-indices of 0.64 and 0.55 for stroke prediction. Risk-class hazard ratios comparing moderate to low and high to low were 3.51 and 2.56 for the ABC-stroke score and 1.10 and 1.62 for the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score. The ABC-stroke score also provided improved risk stratification in patients with moderate stroke risk according to the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, who lack clear recommendations regarding anticoagulation therapy (HR: 4.35, P = 0.001). Decision curve analysis indicated a superior net clinical benefit of using the ABC-stroke score. Conclusion In a large, real-world cohort of patients with acute atrial fibrillation in the emergency department, the ABC-stroke score was superior to the guideline-recommended CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score at predicting stroke risk and refined risk stratification of patients labeled moderate risk by the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, potentially easing treatment decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niederdöckl et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation (n=2,108). ABC-stroke score vs. CHA2DS2-VASc score was evaluated on Ischemic stroke prediction (c-index) (95% CI 0.57-0.70). The ABC-stroke score outperformed the CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting ischemic stroke risk (c-index 0.64 vs 0.55) among patients presenting to the emergency department with acute atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: