Why the study?
Does the ABC-stroke score improve long-term stroke risk prediction compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does the ABC-stroke score improve long-term stroke risk prediction compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation?
The novel ABC-stroke score does not offer significantly better long-term predictive performance for ischemic stroke compared with the standard CHA2DS2-VASc score in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation.
Does not support replacing standard CHA2DS2-VASc for long-term stroke prediction in anticoag.
Background The ABC ‐stroke score (age, biomarkers [N‐terminal fragment B‐type natriuretic peptide, high‐sensitivity troponin], and clinical history [prior stroke/transient ischemic attack]) was proposed to predict stroke in atrial fibrillation ( AF ). This score was derived/validated in 2 clinical trial cohorts in which patients with AF were highly selected and carefully followed‐up. However, the median follow‐up was 1.9 years in the trial cohort; therefore, its long‐term predictive performance remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the long‐term predictive performances of the ABC ‐stroke and CHA 2 DS 2 ‐ VAS c (cardiac failure or dysfunction, hypertension, age ≥75 [doubled], diabetes mellitus, stroke [doubled]—vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years and sex category [female]) scores in a cohort of anticoagulated patients with AF. Methods and Results We recruited 1125 consecutive patients with AF who were stable on vitamin K antagonists and followed‐up for a median of 6.5 years. ABC ‐stroke and CHA 2 DS 2 ‐ VAS c (cardiac failure or dysfunction, hypertension, age ≥75 [doubled], diabetes mellitus, stroke [doubled]—vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years and sex category [female]) scores were calculated and compared. Median CHA 2 DS 2 ‐ VAS c and ABC ‐stroke scores were 4 (interquartile range 3–5) and 9.1 (interquartile range 7.3–11.3), respectively. There were 114 ischemic strokes (1.55% per year) at 6.5 years. The C‐index of ABC ‐stroke at 3.5 years was significantly higher than CHA 2 DS 2 ‐ VAS c (0.663 versus 0.600, P =0.046), but both C‐indexes were nonsignificantly different at 6.5 years. Integrated discrimination improvement showed a small improvement (<2%) in sensitivity at 3.5 and 6.5 years with ABC ‐stroke. For ABC ‐stroke, net reclassification improvement was nonsignificantly different at 3.5 years, and showed a negative reclassification at 6.5 years compared with CHA 2 DS 2 ‐ VAS c. Decision curve analyses did not show a marked improvement in clinical usefulness of the ABC ‐stroke score over the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐ VAS c score. Conclusions In anticoagulated patients with AF followed‐up over a long‐term period, the novel ABC ‐stroke score does not offer significantly better predictive performance compared with the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐ VAS c score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivera‐Caravaca et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: