Key result
BNP reduction predicts paroxysmal AF in acute ischemic stroke with 0.91 AUC.
Why the study?
Identifying reliable predictors for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in acute ischemic stroke remains a critical clinical challenge.
Does the change in brain natriuretic peptide (ΔBNP) levels within 48 hours of admission predict paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Cohort (n=220)
No
Does the change in brain natriuretic peptide (ΔBNP) levels within 48 hours of admission predict paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.98)
p-value: p=<0.001
A reduction in BNP levels within 48 hours of admission is a strong predictor of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
May refine post-stroke AF monitoring; observational data leaves open need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Identifying reliable predictors for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a critical clinical challenge. Since conversion from AF to sinus rhythm reduces plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, we hypothesized that BNP reduction could serve as a biomarker for detecting PAF in AIS cases. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive AIS cases admitted to our institution from 2022 to 2025, measuring BNP twice: upon admission and within 48 hours. Changes in BNP levels (ΔBNP) and logarithmically transformed BNP values (ΔLog BNP), and multiple stroke-associated covariates were compared across three groups: cardioembolic stroke due to PAF (CES-PAF), other CES etiologies (CES), and non-CES. The diagnostic performance of ΔLog BNP for CES-PAF was evaluated and compared with established PAF predictors. RESULTS: Among 400 consecutive AIS cases, 220 were eligible. Median ΔBNP (pg/mL) was -19.6 in the CES-PAF group (n = 30), +82.1 in the CES group (n = 67), and +25.5 in the non-CES group (n = 123). ΔLog BNP was significantly lower in the CES-PAF group (vs. CES: p < 0.001, vs. non-CES: p < 0.001). This association remained significant following multivariate adjustment for stroke-associated covariates (vs. CES: p < 0.001, vs. non-CES: p < 0.001). ΔLog BNP demonstrated superior predictive performance compared with established PAF predictors, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.91 (95 % CI: 0.84-0.98). Composite scores incorporating ΔLog BNP further enhanced diagnostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ΔBNP could be a promising practical clinical biomarker for identifying PAF in patients with causally related AIS, warranting validation in larger prospective cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitamura et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (n=220). Change in BNP levels (ΔBNP) vs. Established PAF predictors was evaluated on Diagnostic performance of ΔLog BNP for cardioembolic stroke due to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AUC 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.98, p=<0.001). Reduction in BNP levels (ΔLog BNP) demonstrated superior predictive performance for detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in acute ischemic stroke (AUC 0.91; 95% CI 0.84-0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: