Why the study?
Enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring (EPM) improves paroxysmal AF detection after acute ischemic stroke but is not feasible for all patients, raising the question of whether BNP can select high-risk patients for EPM.
Does enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring improve the detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to usual care in patients with acute cerebral ischemia?
Does enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring improve the detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to usual care in patients with acute cerebral ischemia?
Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measured early after ischemic stroke can identify patients at high risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, optimizing the diagnostic yield of prolonged ECG monitoring.
May support BNP-guided EPM selection after ischemic stroke; leaves open whether this improves detection or outcomes in trials.
Background and Purpose— Diagnosing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) can be challenging after acute ischemic stroke. Enhanced and prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring (EPM) improves the detection rate but is not feasible for all patients. We hypothesized that brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) may help to identify patients with stroke at high risk for pAF to select patients for EPM more effectively. Methods— Patients with acute cerebral ischemia ≥60 years presenting in sinus rhythm and without history of AF were included into a prospective, randomized multicenter study to receive either EPM (3× 10-day Holter-ECG) or usual stroke care diagnostic work-up. BNP plasma levels were measured on randomization and 3 months thereafter. Levels were compared between patients with and without pAF detected by means of EPM or usual care. Furthermore, the number needed to screen for EPM depending on BNP cut offs was calculated. Results— A total of 398 patients were analyzed. In 373 patients (93.7%), BNP was measured at baseline and in 275 patients (69.1%) after 3 months. pAF was found in 27 patients by means of EPM and in 9 patients by means of usual care ( P =0.002). Median BNP was higher in patients with pAF as compared to patients without AF in both study arms at baseline (57.8 versus 28.3 pg/mL in the EPM arm, P =0.0003; 46.2 versus 27.7 pg/mL, P =0.28 in the control arm) and after 3 months (74.9 versus 31.3 pg/mL, P =0.012 in the EPM arm, 99.3 versus 26.3 pg/mL, P =0.02 in the control arm). Applying a cut off of 100 pg/mL, the number needed to screen was reduced from 18 by usual care to 3 by EPM. Conclusions— BNP measured early after ischemic stroke identifies a subgroup of patients with stroke at increased risk for AF, in whom EPM is particularly efficacious. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01855035.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wasser et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: