Key result
Concurrent depression and smoking linked to ~179% higher ACS risk versus non-depressed non-smokers.
Why the study?
It was hypothesized that interactions between depression, alcohol intake, and smoking status could significantly influence ACS risk, but the magnitude of depression's association with ACS and these potential interactions required investigation.
Does the interaction between depression, alcohol intake, and smoking influence the risk of acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=3,254)
Yes
Does the interaction between depression, alcohol intake, and smoking influence the risk of acute coronary syndrome?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The combination of depression and smoking significantly increases the risk of acute coronary syndrome, highlighting the potential benefit of concurrent interventions for both risk factors.
OBJECTIVE: Our study hypothesizes that the interaction between depression, alcohol intake, and smoking status can significantly influence the risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aim to investigate the magnitude of the association between depression and ACS risk and explore how alcohol intake and smoking status affect this association. METHODS: We used data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. The primary exposure of interest was the presence of depression, as measured using the Beck Depression Inventory score at baseline. The primary outcome was the occurrence of ACS observed in the biennial follow-up surveys. We used Cox proportional regression analysis to estimate the effect of depression on ACS incidence. We conducted interaction and joint effect analyses to explore the interactions between depression and health-related habits including alcohol intake and smoking with regard to ACS incidence. RESULTS: During 16 years of follow-up among 3,254 individuals, we documented 88 cases of new-onset ACS (2.2 cases per 1,000 personyears). We found no association between depression and ACS risk; furthermore, the effect of depression on ACS risk by alcohol intake and smoking status did not differ significantly. In the analysis to observe the joint effect of smoking and depression, the multivariate hazard ratios of ACS were 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-2.36) for non-smoking and depression, 1.52 (95% CI, 0.83-2.82) for smoking and non-depression, and 2.79 (95% CI, 1.21-6.41) for smoking and depression compared with non-smoking and non-depression. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals the combined effect of depression and smoking on ACS risk, highlighting the potential benefits of concurrent interventions for both depression and smoking for cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=3,254). Depression and smoking vs. Non-depression and non-smoking was evaluated on Occurrence of acute coronary syndrome (HR 2.79, 95% CI 1.21-6.41). The concurrent presence of depression and smoking significantly increased the risk of acute coronary syndrome (HR 2.79) compared to individuals without depression who do not smoke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: