Key result
Adaptive heart rate-based seizure detection reduces false alarms ~30% versus a patient-independent classifier.
Why the study?
Does a real-time adaptive seizure detection algorithm improve sensitivity and reduce false alarms compared to a patient-independent classifier in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy?
Does a real-time adaptive seizure detection algorithm improve sensitivity and reduce false alarms compared to a patient-independent classifier in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy?
A real-time adaptive heart rate-based seizure detection algorithm reduces false alarms by 30% compared to a patient-independent classifier while maintaining sensitivity.
May lower false alarms in temporal lobe epilepsy monitoring; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: Automated seizure detection in the home environment has attracted increasing interest in recent decades. Heart rate-based seizure detection is a way to detect temporal lobe epilepsy seizures at home, but patient-independent classifiers have been shown to be insufficiently accurate. This is due to the high patient-dependence of heart rate features, whereas this method does not use patient-specific data. Patient-specific classifiers take into account patient-specific data, but often not enough patient data are available for a fully robust patient-specific classifier. Therefore a real-time adaptive seizure detection algorithm is proposed here. APPROACH: The algorithm starts with a patient-independent classifier, but gradually adapts to the patient-specific characteristics while they are obtained 'on the go'. This is done by using real-time user feedback to annotate previously generated alarms, causing an immediate update to the used support vector machine classifier. Data annotated as seizures are automatically removed from the updating procedure if their detection would lead to too many false alarms. This is done in order to cope with potentially incorrect feedback. MAIN RESULTS: The adaptive classifier resulted in an overall sensitivity of 77.12% and 1.24 false alarms per hour when applied to over 2833 h of heart rate data from 19 patients with 153 clinical seizures. This is around 30% fewer false alarms compared to a patient-independent classifier with a similar sensitivity. SIGNIFICANCE: This low-complexity adaptive algorithm is able to deal well with incorrect feedback, making it ideal for a seizure warning system, and in the future it will also include complementary modalities to improve its performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cooman et al. (2017) studied Temporal lobe epilepsy (n=19). Adaptive heart rate-based seizure detection algorithm vs. Patient-independent classifier was evaluated on Sensitivity and false alarm rate. A real-time adaptive heart rate-based seizure detection algorithm achieved 77.12% sensitivity and 1.24 false alarms per hour, reducing false alarms by ~30% vs a patient-independent classifier.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: