Key result
Catheter ablation carries a ~1.4% major complication rate overall, with highest risks for VT.
Why the study?
In-hospital complications of catheter ablation for AF, AFL, and VT may be overestimated by analyses of administrative data.
What is the incidence of major in-hospital complications after catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias when individually adjudicated compared to administrative coding?
Population
43 031 ablations for AF, AFL, and VT in four German tertiary centres
Comparison
AF vs AFL vs VT catheter ablations
Design
Multicentre retrospective observational study with individual case adjudication
Follow-up
In-hospital
Authors
Loading...
Adjudicated rates support lower ablation-related mortality than administrative coding; leaves open need for prospective validation of VT risks.
Observational (n=43,031)
Yes
What is the incidence of major in-hospital complications after catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias when individually adjudicated compared to administrative coding?
Individual case adjudication of administrative data reveals that major complications after catheter ablation are low for AF and AFL (~1.0%) but higher for VT (5.3%), with actual ablation-related mortality being lower than administrative coding suggests.
Eckardt et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and ventricular tachycardia (n=43,031). Catheter ablation was evaluated on Major peri-procedural complications. Major peri-procedural complications after catheter ablation occurred in 1.4% of procedures overall, with rates of 1.1% for AF, 1.0% for AFL, and 5.3% for VT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: