Key result
His bundle analysis in patients with indications for cardiac pacing revealed a 50% incidence of distal conduction abnormalities and a 60% incidence of intraventricular conduction disturbances.
Why the study?
What is the incidence of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction abnormalities in patients with clinical indications for transvenous cardiac pacing?
Observational (n=80)
What is the incidence of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction abnormalities in patients with clinical indications for transvenous cardiac pacing?
In patients requiring cardiac pacing, His bundle studies reveal a high incidence (50%) of distal conduction abnormalities.
Supports His bundle mapping to detect distal disease in pacing candidates; leaves open impact on lead selection or outcomes.
Eighty patients with clinical indications for cardiac pacing had atrioventricular conduction analysed by His bundle study. The indications for cardiac pacing included high grade atrioventricular block, sick sinus node syndrome without tachycardia, bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome, unstable bilateral bundle-branch block, and uncontrolled ventricular irritability. Complete heart block, Wenckeback block (Mobitz I), and 2:1 block were noted proximal and distal to the His bundle. Mobitz II block only occurred distal to the His bundle. Of special interest were the high incidence of distal conduction abnormalities by His bundle analysis (40/80, 50%), the re-establishment of normal atrioventricular conduction in acutely ill patients with recent evidence of heart block, and the high incidence of intraventricular conduction disturbances on standard electrocardiogram (48/80, 60%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohen et al. (1975) conducted an observational in Clinical indications for cardiac pacing (n=80). His bundle study was evaluated on Distal conduction abnormalities by His bundle analysis. His bundle analysis in patients with indications for cardiac pacing revealed a 50% incidence of distal conduction abnormalities and a 60% incidence of intraventricular conduction disturbances.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: