Key result
Incident midlife prolonged QT interval shows no link to late-life cognitive performance or decline.
Why the study?
Measures of cardiac ventricular electrophysiology have been linked to cognitive performance in cross-sectional studies, but whether worsening ventricular repolarization in midlife associates with late-life cognitive decline remained unknown.
Does incident prolonged QT interval in midlife predict late-life cognitive decline in Japanese American men?
Cohort (n=2,511)
Does incident prolonged QT interval in midlife predict late-life cognitive decline in Japanese American men?
Effect estimate: Difference 0.04 (95% CI -0.28, 0.35)
p-value: p=0.81
Incident prolonged QT interval in midlife does not appear to be associated with late-life cognitive performance or cognitive decline.
Does not support midlife QT prolongation for cognitive risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in diverse cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Measures of cardiac ventricular electrophysiology have been associated with cognitive performance in cross-sectional studies. We sought to evaluate the association of worsening ventricular repolarization in midlife, as measured by incident prolonged QT interval, with cognitive decline in late life. METHODS: Midlife QT interval was assessed by electrocardiography during three study visits from 1965/68 to 1971/74 in a cohort of Japanese American men aged 46-68 at Exam 1 from the Honolulu Heart Study. We defined incident prolonged QT as the QT interval in the upper quartile at Exam 2 or 3 after QT interval in lower three quartiles at Exam 1. Cognitive performance was assessed at least once using the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI), scored using item response theory (CASI-IRT), during four subsequent visits from 1991/93 to 1999/2000 among 2,511 of the 4,737 men in the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study otherwise eligible for inclusion in analyses. We used marginal structural modeling to determine the association of incident prolonged QT with cognitive decline, using weighting to account for confounding and attrition. RESULTS: Incident prolonged QT interval in midlife was not associated with late-life CASI-IRT at cognitive baseline (estimated difference in CASI-IRT: 0.04; 95% CI: -0.28, 0.35; p = 0.81), or change in CASI-IRT over time (estimated difference in annual change in CASI-IRT: -0.002; 95%CI: -0.013, 0.010; p = 0.79). Findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Although many midlife cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac structure and function measures are associated with late-life cognitive decline, incident prolonged QT interval in midlife was not associated with late-life cognitive performance or cognitive decline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suemoto et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Cognitive decline (n=2,511). Incident prolonged QT interval in midlife vs. No incident prolonged QT interval was evaluated on Late-life cognitive performance (CASI-IRT at baseline) (Difference 0.04, 95% CI -0.28, 0.35, p=0.81). Incident prolonged QT interval in midlife was not associated with late-life cognitive performance (estimated difference 0.04; 95% CI -0.28 to 0.35; p=0.81) or cognitive decline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: