Why the study?
Does non-apical location of the right ventricular lead tip reduce mortality in patients with implanted pacemakers?
Cohort (n=450)
No
Does non-apical location of the right ventricular lead tip reduce mortality in patients with implanted pacemakers?
Effect estimate: HR 0.772 (95% CI 0.49-1.21)
p-value: p=0.259
Non-apical right ventricular lead placement may improve long-term survival in pacemaker patients, particularly in men.
Non-apical RV lead placement may lower mortality in male pacemaker patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Pacing remains the method of choice for treatment of cardiac electrical conduction disorders. This study examined the interrelationship between the site of the right ventricular lead tip and patient prognosis in association with other cardiovascular risk factors over a 4‑year follow-up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 450 consecutive patients (223 women; aged 69.16 ± 9.63 years) who had their first SSI or DDD pacemaker implanted for typical indications. RESULTS: During follow-up, 91 (20.2%) patients died. The positive prognostic factors were: female sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.426), DDD pacemaker (HR = 0.526), oral anticoagulant use (HR = 0.330; all groups), sodium concentration (HR = 0.926), oral anticoagulant (HR = 0.115) and statin (HR = 0.260) use (female group), and non-apical location of the right ventricular lead tip (HR = 0.549; male group). Risk factors for death were: age (HR = 1.063), diabetes requiring insulin (HR = 2.832), creatinine concentration (HR = 1.005; all groups), age (HR = 1.11; female group), and elevated creatinine level (HR = 1.012; male group). In all patients, the non-apical location of the right ventricular lead tip was associated with an 18.92% reduced mortality rate during the 4‑year follow-up, which was statistically significant for the male group. CONCLUSION: The non-apical location of the right ventricular lead tip was a positive prognostic factor and was statistically significant in the male subgroup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krzemien-Wolska et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Implanted pacemakers (n=450). Non-apical right ventricular lead location vs. Apical right ventricular lead location was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.772, 95% CI 0.49-1.21, p=0.259).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: