Key result
Intracoronary irrigation with chilled saline significantly lowered peak intracoronary temperature compared to nonchilled saline during epicardial RFA (23.6 vs 54.6 degrees C, P=0.001).
Why the study?
Does intracoronary irrigation with chilled saline prevent heat-induced damage to the coronary artery endothelium during epicardial radiofrequency ablation in an in vitro ovine heart model?
Does intracoronary irrigation with chilled saline prevent heat-induced damage to the coronary artery endothelium during epicardial radiofrequency ablation in an in vitro ovine heart model?
Absolute Event Rate: 23.6% vs 54.6%
p-value: p=0.001
Intracoronary irrigation with chilled saline significantly reduces peak intracoronary temperatures and increases the distance between ablation lesions and the artery wall in an in vitro ovine model, suggesting a protective effect during epicardial RFA.
Chilled saline irrigation merits in vivo testing for endothelial protection; leaves open translation to clinical epicardial RFA.
INTRODUCTION: The coronary arteries can be damaged during epicardial radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures. We hypothesized that intracoronary irrigation with chilled saline may be a useful technique for minimizing heat-induced damage to the coronary artery endothelium during this procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine ablation procedures were performed on 17 freshly excised ovine hearts. Radiofrequency current was delivered through an internally cooled, 4-mm-tip ablation catheter placed directly over the coronary artery (24 applications) and over noncoronary epicardium (5 applications). An Amplatz coronary catheter was used to internally irrigate the coronary artery with either 37 degrees C or 5 degrees C 0.9% saline (12 ablations each group). Fluroptic temperature probes were placed within the artery lumen under the ablation site and 15 mm distal from the ablation site. The peak intracoronary temperature directly under the ablation catheter was significantly lower (P = 0.001) in the chilled than in the nonchilled saline irrigation group (23.6 degrees C, interquartile range [IQR] 15.7-39.8 vs 54.6 degrees C, IQR 48.9-58.6). Blue tetrazolium stained lesion sections showed that the median distance between the ablation lesion and the artery wall was significantly higher (P = 0.004) for the chilled versus the nonchilled saline irrigation group (0.42 mm, IQR 0.25-0.70 vs 0.00 mm, IQR 0.00-0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary irrigation with chilled saline may protect the coronary artery endothelium from heat-induced damage during epicardial RFA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thyer et al. (2006) studied Coronary artery damage during epicardial radiofrequency ablation (n=17). Intracoronary irrigation with chilled saline vs. Intracoronary irrigation with 37 degrees C 0.9% saline was evaluated on Peak intracoronary temperature directly under the ablation catheter (p=0.001). Intracoronary irrigation with chilled saline significantly lowered peak intracoronary temperature compared to nonchilled saline during epicardial RFA (23.6 vs 54.6 degrees C, P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: