Key result
Ice-cold saline irrigation cooled the tissue-electrode interface significantly better than ambient-temperature saline (53.9 ± 9.6 °C vs. 63 ± 11.4 °C, P < 0.001), but reduced lesion size at lower power.
Why the study?
Does ice-cold saline irrigation affect tissue-electrode interface temperature and lesion dimensions compared to ambient-temperature saline during in vitro radiofrequency ablation?
Does ice-cold saline irrigation affect tissue-electrode interface temperature and lesion dimensions compared to ambient-temperature saline during in vitro radiofrequency ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 53.9% vs 63%
p-value: p=<0.001
Ice-cold saline irrigation during RF ablation improves tissue-electrode interface cooling compared to ambient-temperature saline, but may reduce lesion size at lower power settings.
Ice-cold saline may limit lesion size at lower power despite better cooling; leaves open net benefit in clinical RF ablation.
INTRODUCTION: Irrigated radiofrequency (RF) catheters allow tissue-electrode interface cooling, decreasing thrombus risk while enabling higher RF power delivery. The impact of irrigation with ice-cold saline (ICS) instead of conventional ambient-temperature saline (ATS) on lesion formation is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed 120 RF ablations in vitro on porcine left ventricles, using ICS (<5 °C) or ATS (21 °C) irrigation. For ICS irrigation, the irrigation circuit was cooled externally to maintain delivery of cooled saline at the catheter's tip. We applied 20 g of contact force, and delivered 20 W (irrigation 8 or 17 mL/min) or 30 W (irrigation 17 or 30 mL/min) RF power. Temperatures at tissue-electrode interface and 3-mm depth were assessed by fluoroptic probes. Lesion dimensions were assessed. ICS irrigation cooled the tissue-electrode interface better than ATS (53.9 ± 9.6 °C vs. 63 ± 11.4 °C, P < 0.001). Temperatures at 3-mm depth were similar at 30 W using ICS and ATS (104.2 ± 9.3 °C vs. 105.8 ± 7.3 °C, P = 0.5), but were cooler at 20 W using ICS (71.3 ± 11.6 °C vs. 100.2 ± 11.9 °C, P < 0.001). This translated into smaller lesions at 20 W with ICS versus ATS. At 30 W with 17 mL/min flow rate, lesions had the same depth with ICS and ATS (4.9 ± 0.8 mm vs. 5.4 ± 0.7 mm, P = 0.13) but were narrower with ICS (7.7 ± 0.8 mm vs. 9.3 ± 1.2 mm, P = 0.001). At 30 mL/min, lesions had the same dimensions. Steam pop rate was similar using ICS or ATS irrigation. CONCLUSION: ICS irrigation more effectively cools tissue-electrode interface than ATS. This may improve RF safety by potentially decreasing thrombus formation, thus facilitating safe ablation at a low saline volume load. However at lower RF power, ICS reduced lesion size compared to ATS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Squara et al. (2014) studied Radiofrequency ablation (n=120). Ice-cold saline (ICS) irrigation vs. Ambient-temperature saline (ATS) irrigation was evaluated on Tissue-electrode interface temperature (p=<0.001). Ice-cold saline irrigation cooled the tissue-electrode interface significantly better than ambient-temperature saline (53.9 ± 9.6 °C vs. 63 ± 11.4 °C, P < 0.001), but reduced lesion size at lower power.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: