Why the study?
CIED infections cause significant morbidity and mortality, and their incidence is rising despite optimal antimicrobial use, prompting evaluation of antibiotic envelope efficacy and identifying which patient subsets benefit most.
Does an antibiotic envelope reduce the risk of major infection in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement?
Does an antibiotic envelope reduce the risk of major infection in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement?
The use of an antibiotic envelope during CIED implantation significantly reduces the risk of major infections, particularly in patients receiving high-power devices, without affecting mortality.
May support antibiotic envelope use in CIED implantation; extends mostly observational data but leaves definitive practice change open.
Background Infections after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of CIED is increasing overtime despite the optimal use of antimicrobial agents. This systematic review and meta‐analysis will address the latest evidence on the use of AE to mitigate the risk of CIED infection, and which subset of patients will they benefit the most. Methods We performed a comprehensive search on topics that assesses antibiotic envelope and implantable cardiac electronic device up until August 2019. Results There were a total of 32,329 subjects from six studies. Antibiotic envelope was associated with a lower risk of major infection with OR 0.42 [0.19, 0.97], P = .04; I 2 : 58% and HR 0.52 [0.32, 0.85], P = .009; I 2 : 80%. Upon sensitivity analysis by removing a study, the OR became 0.40 [0.27, 0.59], P < .001; I 2 : 46%. Subgroup analysis for 12 months’ infection was OR 0.65 [0.43, 0.99], P = .04; I 2 : 49%. Meta‐analysis of propensity‐matched cohort showed a reduced risk of infection with AE (OR of 0.14 [0.05, 0.41], P < .001; I 2 :0%). Mortality was similar in both AE and control groups. Antibiotic envelope reduced the incidence of infection in patients receiving high‐power device (OR 0.44 [0.27, 0.73], P = .001; I 2 :0%) but not low‐power device. Conclusion Antibiotic envelope (TYRX) was found to be safe and effective in reducing the risk of major infections in high‐risk patients receiving CIED implantation, especially in those receiving high‐power CIED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pranata et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: