Key result
TYRX-A antibacterial envelope linked to ~100% lower CIED infection risk vs no envelope.
Why the study?
Does a bio-absorbable antibacterial envelope prevent CIED infections in high-risk subjects?
Cohort (n=1,124)
No
Does a bio-absorbable antibacterial envelope prevent CIED infections in high-risk subjects?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of a bio-absorbable antibacterial envelope is associated with a significantly lower prevalence of CIED infections compared to no envelope in high-risk patients.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are potentially preventable complications associated with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. A recently developed bio-absorbable antibacterial envelope (TYRX™-A) might prevent CIED infections in high-risk subjects. However, data regarding safety and efficacy have not been published. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared the prevalence of CIED infections among subjects with ≥2 risk factors treated with the TYRX™-A envelope (N = 135), the nonabsorbable TYRX™ envelope (N = 353), and controls who did not receive an envelope (N = 636). Infection was ascertained by individual chart review. The mean (95% confidence interval) number of risk factors was 3.08 (2.84-3.32) for TYRX™-A, 3.20 (3.07-3.34) for TYRX™, and 3.09 (2.99-3.20) for controls, P = 0.3. After a minimum 300 days follow-up, the prevalence of CIED infection was 0 (0%) for TYRX™-A, 1 (0.3%) for TYRX™, and 20 (3.1%) for controls (P = 1 for TYRX™-A vs. TYRX™, P = 0.03 for TYRX™-A vs. controls, and P = 0.002 for TYRX™ vs. controls). In a propensity score-matched cohort of 316 recipients of either envelope and 316 controls, the prevalence of infection was 0 (0%) and 9 (2.8%), respectively, P = 0.004. When limited to 122 TYRX™-A recipients and 122 propensity-matched controls, the prevalence of CIED infections was 0 (0%) and 5 (4.1%), respectively, P = 0.024. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk subjects, the TYRX™-A bio-absorbable envelope was associated with a very low prevalence of CIED related infections that was comparable to that seen with the nonabsorbable envelope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolek et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections (n=1,124). TYRX™-A bio-absorbable antibacterial envelope vs. Nonabsorbable TYRX™ envelope and no envelope (control) was evaluated on Prevalence of CIED infections (p=0.03). The TYRX™-A bio-absorbable antibacterial envelope was associated with a 0% prevalence of CIED infections compared to 3.1% in controls without an envelope (P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: