Key result
Resterilized CIEDs linked to ~37% higher infection relapse risk versus new devices.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether using resterilized CIEDs increases reinfection risk in patients with previous device infection.
Does reimplantation of resterilized CIEDs increase the risk of infection relapse compared to new CIEDs in patients with previous device infection?
Observational (n=27)
No
Does reimplantation of resterilized CIEDs increase the risk of infection relapse compared to new CIEDs in patients with previous device infection?
Absolute Event Rate: 12.5% vs 9.1%
Subpectoral reimplantation of resterilized CIEDs in patients with previous device infection appears safe and efficacious, with low relapse rates comparable to new devices when combined with complete lead extraction.
Background: Reuse of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can reduce the cost of using these expensive devices. However, whether resterilized CIEDs will increase the risk of reinfection in patients with previous device infection remains unknown. The aim of the present study is to compare the reinfection rates in patients who had initial CIED infection and underwent reimplantation of resterilized CIEDs or new devices. Methods: Data from patients with initial CIED infection who received debridement of the infected pocket and underwent reimplantation of new or resterilized CIEDs at MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, between January 2014 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics, relapse rates of infection, and potential contributing factors to the infection risk were examined. Results: Twenty-seven patients with initial CIED infection and reimplanted new CIEDs (n = 11) or resterilized CIEDs (n = 16) were included. During the 2-year follow-up, there were 1 (9.1%) and 2 (12.5%) infection relapses in the new and resterilized CIED groups, respectively. No relapse occurred for either group if the lead was completely removed or cut short. The median duration between debridement and device reimplantation in patients with infection relapse vs patients without relapse was 97 vs 4.5 days for all included patients, and 97 vs 2 days and 50.5 vs 5.5 days for the new and resterilized CIED groups, respectively. Conclusions: Subpectoral reimplanting of resterilized CIEDs in patients with previous device infection is safe and efficacious. With delicate debridement and complete extraction of the leads, the CIED pocket infection relapse risk can be greatly decreased.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection (n=27). Resterilized CIEDs vs. New CIEDs was evaluated on Infection relapse. Reimplantation of resterilized CIEDs in patients with previous device infection showed a 12.5% infection relapse rate compared to 9.1% with new CIEDs during a 2-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: