Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: Intraplaque haemorrhage is considered a major contributor to lesion progression. We assessed coronary lesions with intraplaque haemorrhage using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated coronary arteries from autopsy hearts using 40MHz IVUS and NIRS and compared the imaging findings to histopathology. A total of 2324 2-mm long histological segments from 101 coronary arteries from 56 autopsy hearts were included. Intraplaque haemorrhage was found pathologically in 0.8% (18/2324) of segments. Segments with intraplaque haemorrhage had more fibroatheromas (FAs) with a greater IVUS plaque burden, a greater prevalence of IVUS echolucent zones, and a higher NIRS-lipid core burden index (LCBI) compared to segments without intraplaque haemorrhage (FAs: 72.2% vs. 18.3%, P < 0.0001; plaque burden: 59.7% [95% confidence interval: 55.5, 64.0] vs. 48.6% [45.8, 51.3], P < 0.0001; echolucent zones: 88.9% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.0001; NIRS-LCBI: 176 [88, 264] vs. 72 [53, 91], P = 0.02). The 16 IVUS superficial echolucent zones with intraplaque haemorrhage had more late FAs but shorter echolucent zone lengths (0.9 mm [0.7, 1.1] vs. 1.7 mm [1.5, 1.9], P < 0.0001) compared to 65 IVUS superficial echolucent zones without intraplaque haemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary imaging features consistent with intraplaque haemorrhage included a greater plaque burden, a higher NIRS-LCBI, and a greater prevalence of IVUS echolucent zones compared to lesions without intraplaque haemorrhage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumura et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: