Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The inference of causation is essential for interpretable scientific research and evidence-based policymaking. Existing causal methods – including those based on intervention, forecasting, and graph models – have achieved considerable success in non-spatial domains such as medicine, economics, and sociology. However, significant challenges arise when these methods are applied to geographic phenomena, which constitute complex spatiotemporal processes integrating geo-events and geo-environments. Current causal methods, which predominantly infer relationships from temporal information, often fail to fully utilize spatial information, such as the locations and distributions of geo-events. Furthermore, they typically overlook spatial lags between events and how these lags vary across different geo-environments. These limitations result in potentially incorrect causal conclusions. To address these issues, we propose a novel causal framework for geographic phenomena. This framework develops an Adaptive Gaussian Field (AGF) model to capture spatial lags. It first extracts spatial association patterns from geo-event locations and distributions, then infers causal relationships from these associations. The integration of spatial lags into both association mining and causal inference is implemented through two novel methods: a spatial-lagged co-distribution mining method and a spatial-lagged Peter-Clark (spatial-PC) method. This proposed framework offers a robust approach for uncovering the underlying mechanisms of geohazards in Yunnan, China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: