Key result
Immediate leadless pacemaker implantation after infected device removal yields 100% success without reinfection.
Why the study?
Leadless pacemakers provide pacing options for device-related infections, but the safety and feasibility of immediate implantation following infected pacemaker extraction without systemic infection needed evaluation.
Does immediate leadless pacemaker implantation provide safe and feasible pacing in patients undergoing extraction of an infected pacemaker?
Observational (n=8)
No
Does immediate leadless pacemaker implantation provide safe and feasible pacing in patients undergoing extraction of an infected pacemaker?
Immediate implantation of a leadless pacemaker after extraction of an infected device appears safe and feasible, offering an alternative to a temporary pacemaker bridge.
May support immediate leadless pacing after infected device extraction; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Leadless pacemakers provide safe and effective pacing options for patients with device-related infections. This study was aimed at observing and evaluating the safety and feasibility of extracting an infected pacemaker device followed by the implantation of a leadless pacemaker in the same location for patients without systemic infection. METHODS: Between December 2019 and September 2020, following a well-planned re-implantation strategy, pacemaker electrodes were removed from patients with device infection and leadless pacemakers were immediately implanted at our center. The patients were then followed up for up to 10 months to assess the safety and practicality of the procedure. RESULTS: Pacemaker electrode removal and immediate leadless pacemaker implantation were successfully achieved in eight patients with pocket infection. After a minimum follow-up period of 1 month and a maximum follow-up of 10 months, the pacing parameters for the patients remained stable and there was no infection at the original capsular bag or in the leadless pacemaker. CONCLUSION: Direct implantation of a leadless pacemaker is safe and feasible for patients with local infection of the pacing system after removal of the electrode as an alternative to a bridge period with a temporary pacemaker. This strategy may be a better option for pacing-dependent patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Pacemaker device infection (n=8). Immediate leadless pacemaker implantation was evaluated on Safety and feasibility (successful implantation, stable pacing parameters, and absence of reinfection). Immediate leadless pacemaker implantation following the removal of an infected pacemaker was successfully achieved with no reinfections and stable pacing parameters in all 8 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: