Key result
Novel substernal ICD lead achieves ventricular pacing in ~97% of patients and terminates induced VF.
Why the study?
Subcutaneous ICDs are an alternative to transvenous systems, but an extravascular lead placed under the sternum has the potential to reduce defibrillation energy and provide pacing therapies.
Does a novel substernal ICD lead adequately sense, pace, and defibrillate in patients?
Observational (n=79)
Does a novel substernal ICD lead adequately sense, pace, and defibrillate in patients?
A novel substernal ICD lead demonstrated acute feasibility for pacing, sensing, and defibrillation, offering a potential extravascular alternative to transvenous and subcutaneous systems.
Hypothesis-generating for substernal ICD leads; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVES: The ASD2 (Acute Extravascular Defibrillation, Pacing, and Electrogram) study evaluated the ability to adequately sense, pace, and defibrillate patients with a novel implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead implanted in the substernal space. BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous ICDs are an alternative to a transvenous defibrillator system when transvenous implantation is not possible or desired. An alternative extravascular system placing a lead under the sternum has the potential to reduce defibrillation energy and the ability to deliver pacing therapies. METHODS: An investigational lead was inserted into the substernal space via a minimally invasive subxiphoid access, and a cutaneous defibrillation patch or subcutaneous active can emulator was placed on the left mid-axillary line. Pacing thresholds and extracardiac stimulation were evaluated. Up to 2 episodes of ventricular fibrillation were induced to test defibrillation efficacy. RESULTS: The substernal lead was implanted in 79 patients, with a median implantation time of 12.0 ± 9.0 min. Ventricular pacing was successful in at least 1 vector in 76 of 78 patients (97.4%), and 72 of 78 (92.3%) patients had capture in ≥1 vector with no extracardiac stimulation. A 30-J shock successfully terminated 104 of 128 episodes (81.3%) of ventricular fibrillation in 69 patients. There were 7 adverse events in 6 patients causally (n = 5) or possibly (n = 2) related to the ASD2 procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The ASD2 study demonstrated the ability to pace, sense, and defibrillate using a lead designed specifically for the substernal space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boersma et al. (2018) reported an observational. Substernal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead was evaluated on Ventricular pacing success in at least 1 vector. A novel substernal ICD lead successfully achieved ventricular pacing in 97.4% of patients and terminated 81.3% of induced ventricular fibrillation episodes with a 30-J shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: