Key result
High visit-to-visit HDL-C variability linked to ~13% greater risk of incident PAD.
Why the study?
Emerging evidence highlights the clinical significance of lipid variability in cardiovascular disease, but its relationship with incident peripheral artery disease risk required investigation.
Does high visit-to-visit variability in HDL-C increase the risk of incident peripheral artery disease in patients with hyperlipidemia?
Cohort (n=93,948)
Yes
Does high visit-to-visit variability in HDL-C increase the risk of incident peripheral artery disease in patients with hyperlipidemia?
Effect estimate: aHR 1.13 (95% CI 1.004-1.27)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.4% vs 2.6%
p-value: p=0.002 for trend
Visit-to-visit variability in HDL-C is independently associated with an increased risk of incident peripheral artery disease in patients with hyperlipidemia, providing incremental prognostic value beyond mean lipid levels.
HDL-C variability may aid PAD risk stratification in hyperlipidemia; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence highlights the clinical significance of lipid variability in cardiovascular disease and adverse outcomes. This study investigated the relationship between lipid variability and incident peripheral artery disease (PAD) risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 93,948 patients in the Chang Gung Research Database in Taiwan who had been diagnosed with hyperlipidemia between 2007 and 2013 and had annual lipid measurements over 4 consecutive years. Lipid levels, including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides, as well as their visit-to-visit variability, were assessed over the 4-year period. Patients were followed until December 31, 2019 for incident PAD development. Over a mean 5.9-year follow-up, 2,735 patients (2.5%) developed PAD. Mean lipid levels were significantly associated with incident PAD. Of note, the average real variability (ARV) in HDL-C was independently associated with increased PAD risk (adjusted hazard ratio 1.13; 95% confidence interval 1.004-1.27 for highest vs. lowest quartile of HDL-C ARV; P for trend=0.002). Sensitivity analysis using variability independent of the mean as the HDL-C variability index confirmed this finding. Consistency was observed across all subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-institutional database analysis, visit-to-visit variability in HDL-C was significantly associated with the risk of incident PAD, independent of traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis, mean lipid levels, and the use of lipid-lowering therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tung et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Hyperlipidemia (n=93,948). High visit-to-visit variability in HDL-C (highest quartile of average real variability) vs. Low visit-to-visit variability in HDL-C (lowest quartile of average real variability) was evaluated on Incident peripheral artery disease (PAD) (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.004-1.27, p=0.002 for trend). High visit-to-visit variability in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly increased the risk of incident peripheral artery disease by 13% compared to low variability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: