Key result
Premature CAD shows no difference in 3-year MACE versus non-premature CAD after first PCI.
Why the study?
CAD prevalence increases with age, yet some individuals develop obstructive CAD at a younger age, leaving differences in risk profiles and outcomes compared to non-premature CAD after PCI to be assessed.
Does premature coronary artery disease affect the risk of adverse events following first percutaneous coronary intervention compared to non-premature CAD?
Cohort (n=6,171)
Patient-blinded
Yes
Does premature coronary artery disease affect the risk of adverse events following first percutaneous coronary intervention compared to non-premature CAD?
Patients with premature CAD undergoing first PCI have lower mortality but higher risks of repeat revascularization and stent thrombosis compared to those with non-premature CAD.
Objectives We assessed differences in risk profile and 3-year outcome between patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for premature and non-premature coronary artery disease (CAD). Background The prevalence of CAD increases with age, yet some individuals develop obstructive CAD at younger age. Methods Among participants in four randomized all-comers PCI trials, without previous coronary revascularization or myocardial infarction (MI), we compared patients with premature (men <50 years; women <55 years) and non-premature CAD. Various clinical endpoints were assessed, including multivariate analyses. Results Of 6,171 patients, 887(14.4%) suffered from premature CAD. These patients had fewer risk factors than patients with non - premature CAD, but were more often smokers (60.7% vs. 26.4%) and overweight (76.2% vs. 69.8%). In addition, premature CAD patients presented more often with ST-segment elevation MI and underwent less often treatment of multiple vessels, and calcified or bifurcated lesions. Furthermore, premature CAD patients had a lower all-cause mortality risk (adj.HR:0.23, 95%-CI: 0.10–0.52; p < 0.001), but target vessel revascularization (adj.HR:1.63, 95%-CI: 1.18–2.26; p = 0.003) and definite stent thrombosis risks (adj.HR:2.24, 95%-CI: 1.06–4.72; p = 0.034) were higher. MACE rates showed no statistically significant difference (6.6% vs. 9.4%; adj.HR:0.86, 95%-CI: 0.65–1.16; p = 0.33). Conclusions About one out of seven PCI patients was treated for premature CAD. These patients had less complex risk profiles than patients with non-premature CAD; yet, their risk of repeated revascularization and stent thrombosis was higher. As lifetime event risk of patients with premature CAD is known to be particularly high, further efforts should be made to improve modifiable risk factors such as smoking and overweight. Clinical Trial Registration [clinicaltrials.gov], TWENTE [NCT01066650]; DUTCH PEERS [NCT01331707]; BIO-RESORT [NCT01674803]; BIONYX [NCT02508714].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinxterhuis et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring first percutaneous coronary intervention (n=6,171). Premature coronary artery disease (men <50 years; women <55 years) vs. Non-premature coronary artery disease was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (adj.HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65-1.16, p=0.33). Premature coronary artery disease in patients undergoing their first percutaneous coronary intervention was not associated with a significant difference in 3-year major adverse cardiac events compared to non-premature disease (adj.HR 0.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: