Key result
Female sex is linked to ~27% higher in-hospital mortality after leadless pacemaker implantation vs men.
Why the study?
To determine differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation based on sex.
Does female sex worsen in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation?
Observational (n=29,000)
Yes
Does female sex worsen in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation?
Effect estimate: aOR 1.27 (95% CI 1.14-1.43)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.5% vs 4.5%
p-value: p=<0.01
Women undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation experience significantly higher in-hospital mortality, longer lengths of stay, and higher hospitalization costs compared to men.
Female sex was associated with higher in-hospital mortality after leadless pacemaker implantation; leaves open whether sex-specific strategies warrant prospective study.
BACKGROUND: To determine differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation based on sex. METHODS: For the purpose of this study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database for years 2016-2020. The study group was then stratified based on sex. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes including complications were then analyzed in each group. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to analyze the association of sex with important outcomes of mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention and any vascular complication), prolonged length of stay (defined as > 6 days), and increased cost of hospitalization (defined as median cost > 34,098$) after leadless pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: A total of 29,000 leadless pacemakers (n in women = 12,960, 44.7%) were implanted during our study period. Women were found to have an increased burden of co-morbidities as compared to men. In the adjusted analysis, the likelihood of mortality (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.43), major complications (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.18), prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15), and increased hospitalization cost (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20) were higher in women as compared to men after leadless pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSION: Important and significant differences exist in leadless pacemaker implantation in women as compared to men. These findings highlight the need for evaluating etiologies behind such differences with a goal of improving outcomes in all patients after leadless pacemaker implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Bradyarrhythmia requiring leadless pacemaker (n=29,000). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.43, p=<0.01). Women undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation had a significantly higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.27) compared to men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: