Key result
Elevated inflammatory and oxidative biomarkers are linked to accelerated progression of internal carotid IMT.
Why the study?
The exact relationship between circulating markers of inflammation and the progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness remained unclear.
Are higher circulating markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction associated with increased progression of internal carotid intima-media thickness in a community-based cohort?
Cohort (n=2,264)
No
Are higher circulating markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction associated with increased progression of internal carotid intima-media thickness in a community-based cohort?
Specific circulating markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction independently predict the accelerated progression of subclinical internal carotid atherosclerosis, identifying patients potentially at higher risk for future cerebrovascular events.
Inflammatory markers may refine cerebrovascular risk stratification; leaves open whether targeting them slows carotid atherosclerosis progression.
Background Circulating markers of inflammation may be associated with carotid artery intima‐media thickness (CIMT), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis associated with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, although the exact relationship between these circulating markers of inflammation and progression of CIMT is unclear. We hypothesize that markers of circulating inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are associated with progression of CIMT in the FHS (Framingham Heart Study) cohort. Methods Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the association between specific circulating markers of inflammation with cross‐sectional internal CIMT (ICIMT) measurement and ICIMT progression defined as rate of change of intima‐media thickness (mm/y) in the internal carotid artery. Our primary analyses adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, APOE4 , body mass index, and smoking at the time of baseline CIMT measurement. Secondary analyses additionally adjusted for baseline CIMT measurements. Results We studied 2264 participants (mean age 57.2 years, 54% women). In our primary multivariable adjusted analysis, we observed that participants with higher baseline C‐reactive protein (β=0.057 [95% CI, 0.012–0.102]; P =0.013), lipoprotein‐associated phospholipase A activity (β=0.050 [95% CI, 0.006–0.094]; P =0.027), and isoprostanes (β=0.054 [95% CI, 0.013–0.101]; P =0.012) had significantly higher ICIMT progression, after adjusting for vascular risk factors and baseline CIMT. In a cross‐sectional analysis at follow‐up, we also observed that participants with higher levels of interleukin‐6, osteoprotegerin, and P‐selectin had significantly higher ICIMT. Conclusions Specific markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction were associated with increased ICIMT and carotid atherosclerosis progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baradaran et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Subclinical Carotid Atherosclerosis (n=2,264). Elevated circulating markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, Lp-PLA2 activity, isoprostanes) vs. Lower baseline levels of circulating inflammatory markers was evaluated on Progression of internal carotid intima-media thickness (ICIMT rate of change in mm/year) (β=0.057, 95% CI 0.012-0.102, p=0.013). Higher baseline circulating levels of C-reactive protein (β=0.057), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity, and isoprostanes were significantly associated with increased progression of internal carotid intima-media thickness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: