Key result
Transmitral VT ablation in MitraClip patients achieves 100% procedural success without worsening regurgitation.
Why the study?
Is catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia using the anterograde transmitral route feasible and safe in patients with a pre-existing MitraClip device?
Case Report (n=5)
Is catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia using the anterograde transmitral route feasible and safe in patients with a pre-existing MitraClip device?
Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia using the anterograde transmitral route is feasible and safe in patients with a pre-existing MitraClip device.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports transmitral VT ablation in select MitraClip patients; leaves open generalizability and need for prospective validation.
VT Ablation in MitraClip Patients Introduction Patients with mitral regurgitation are increasingly treated by percutaneous implantation of a MitraClip device (Abbott Park, IL, USA). We investigate the feasibility and safety of the transmitral catheter route for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in these patients. Methods The mitral valve with the MitraClip in situ was crossed under transesophageal 3‐dimensional echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance using a steerable sheath for ablation of the left ventricle. Results Five patients (all males, median age 74.0 ± 16.0 years) who had previously a MitraClip implanted were referred for catheter ablation of VT. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 29.0% ± 24.0%. One patient had both an atrial septal defect and a left atrial appendage occluder device in addition to a MitraClip. The duration between MitraClip implantation and ablation was 1019.0 ± 783.0 days. After transseptal puncture, ablation catheter was successfully steered through the mitral valve with the use of fluoroscopy. A complete high‐density map of the substrate in sinus rhythm could be obtained in all patients using multipolar mapping catheters. In 1 patient, mapping was carried out using a mini‐basket catheter. Procedural endpoints, noninducibility of all VTs, and abolition of all late potentials were achieved in all patients. Procedure time was 255.0 ± 52.5 minute, fluoroscopy time was 23.0 ± 7.3, and the radiation dose was 61.0 ± 37.5 Gycm 2 . No mitral insufficiency or worsening of regurgitation was documented after the procedure. Conclusions This is the first report demonstrating the feasibility and safety of VT ablation in patients with a MitraClip device using the anterograde transmitral catheter route.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haegeli et al. (2017) conducted a case report in Ventricular tachycardia in patients with a MitraClip device (n=5). Transmitral catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia was evaluated on Procedural endpoints (noninducibility of all VTs and abolition of all late potentials). Transmitral catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with a MitraClip device was feasible and safe, achieving procedural endpoints in 100% of cases without worsening regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: