Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study reveals disparities between subjective and objective health literacy in heart transplant recipients, indicating they represent distinct clinical constructs.
Background Health literacy (HL) is associated with patient adherence, healthcare utilization, patient self-management, however there is limited data available on how it should be interpreted and measured among heart transplant recipients. Methods In a cross-sectional study among heart transplant recipients ( n = 98) under follow-up at Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Centre, HLS-EU-Q47 and Newest Vital Sign test were used to measure objective and subjective HL. Results The HLS-EU-Q47, a measure for subjective HL, showed that 49.5% of heart transplant recipients had excellent, 35.1% sufficient, 14.4% problematic and 1% inadequate HL. For objective HL, measured with the NVS test, the frequency of HL categories (adequate HL 49%, possibility of limited HL 26.5%, high likelihood of limited HL 24.5%) was significantly different. We were not able to identify a significant predictor of subjective HL. However, objective HL showed a significant association with both age ( β = −0.445, p < 0.001) and educational attainment ( β = 0.212, p = 0.023). There was no significant association between HL and health risks or health-promoting behaviors (alcohol consumption, physical exercise). Conclusion The results of our research indicate that subjective and objective (performance-based) HL are two different concepts and should be treated separately. Finding ways to improve HL among heart transplant recipients should be a priority and requires a complex assessment process, a multi-faceted approach both for caregivers and stakeholders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hajnes-Szabó et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: