Key result
High-resolution mapping identifies PV-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardias in ~7% of cases, revealing distinct ablatable circuits.
Why the study?
The circuit of pulmonary vein-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardia after atrial fibrillation ablation is sometimes difficult to identify using conventional mapping.
Does high-resolution mapping with the Rhythmia system identify the circuit and guide ablation of pulmonary vein-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardia in patients with prior atrial fibrillation ablation?
Observational (n=281)
Yes
Does high-resolution mapping with the Rhythmia system identify the circuit and guide ablation of pulmonary vein-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardia in patients with prior atrial fibrillation ablation?
High-resolution mapping effectively identifies the variable circuits and distinct entrance/exit gaps of PV-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardias, enabling curative targeted ablation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable targeted ablation of PV-gap re-entrant ATs; leaves open whether high-resolution mapping improves outcomes versus conventional approaches.
AIMS: The circuit of pulmonary vein-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardia (PV-gap RAT) after atrial fibrillation ablation is sometimes difficult to identify by conventional mapping. We analysed the detailed circuit and electrophysiological features of PV-gap RATs using a novel high-resolution mapping system. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre study investigated 27 (7%) PV-gap RATs in 26 patients among 378 atrial tachycardias (ATs) mapped with Rhythmia™ system in 281 patients. The tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 258 ± 52 ms with P-wave duration of 116 ± 28 ms. Three types of PV-gap RAT circuits were identified: (A) two gaps in one pulmonary vein (PV) (unilateral circuit) (n = 17); (B) two gaps in the ipsilateral superior and inferior PVs (unilateral circuit) (n = 6); and (C) two gaps in one PV with a large circuit around contralateral PVs (bilateral circuit) (n = 4). Rhythmia™ mapping demonstrated two distinctive entrance and exit gaps of 7.6 ± 2.5 and 7.9 ± 4.1 mm in width, respectively, the local signals of which showed slow conduction (0.14 ± 0.18 and 0.11 ± 0.10m/s) with fragmentation (duration 86 ± 27 and 78 ± 23 ms) and low-voltage (0.17 ± 0.13 and 0.17 ± 0.21 mV). Twenty-two ATs were terminated (mechanical bump in one) and five were changed by the first radiofrequency application at the entrance or exit gap. Moreover, the conduction time inside the PVs (entrance-to-exit) was 138 ± 60 ms (54 ± 22% of TCL); in all cases, this resulted in demonstrating P-wave with an isoelectric line in all leads. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to demonstrate the detailed mechanisms of PV-gap re-entry that showed evident entrance and exit gaps using a high-resolution mapping system. The circuits were variable and Rhythmia™-guided ablation targeting the PV-gap can be curative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Pulmonary vein-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardia following atrial fibrillation ablation (n=281). High-resolution mapping (Rhythmia system) was evaluated on Detailed circuit and electrophysiological features of PV-gap RATs. High-resolution mapping identified 27 PV-gap re-entrant atrial tachycardias, revealing three distinct circuit types with evident entrance and exit gaps that were successfully ablated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: