Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation increases thromboembolism risk, prompting investigation into the efficacy, safety, and number needed to treat for net effect of oral anticoagulation therapy in Spain.
Does oral anticoagulation therapy alone reduce the composite of thromboembolism, acute coronary syndrome, or cardiovascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort
Yes
Does oral anticoagulation therapy alone reduce the composite of thromboembolism, acute coronary syndrome, or cardiovascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation?
In a contemporary Spanish cohort of AF patients, oral anticoagulation alone was associated with significantly lower rates of thromboembolism, ACS, and cardiovascular death at 1 year compared to other regimens.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of thromboembolism. We investigate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy and explored the number needed to treat for net effect (NNTnet) of OAC in the Spanish cohort of the EURObservational Research Programme-AF (EORP-AF) Long-term General Registry. METHODS: The EORP-AF General Registry is a prospective, multicentre registry conducted in ESC countries, including consecutive AF patients. For the present analysis, we used the Spanish cohort, and the primary outcome was any thromboembolism (TE)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/cardiovascular death during the first year of follow-up. RESULTS: -VASc and HAS-BLED of 3 [IQR 2-5] and 2 [IQR 1-2], respectively). 548 (75.2%) patients received OAC alone (318 [43.6%] on VKAs and 230 [31.6%] on DOACs). After 1 year, the use of OAC alone showed lower rates of any TE/ACS/cardiovascular death (3.0%/year; p < 0.001) compared to other regimens, and non-use of OAC alone (HR 4.18, 95% CI 2.12-8.27) was independently associated with any TE/ACS/cardiovascular death. Balancing the effects of treatment, the NNTnet to provide an overall benefit of OAC therapy was 24. The proportion of patients on OAC increased at 1 year (87% to 88.1%), particularly on DOACs (33.6% to 39.9%) (p = 0.015), with low discontinuation rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary cohort of AF patients, OAC therapy was associated with better clinical outcomes at 1 year and positive NNTnet. OAC use slightly increased during the follow-up, with low discontinuation rates and higher prescription of DOACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabeza et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy vs. Other regimens / non-use of OAC alone was evaluated on Any thromboembolism (TE)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/cardiovascular death (HR 4.18, 95% CI 2.12-8.27, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: