Key result
Programmatic quality measures align structures, processes, and outcomes to streamline reporting and reduce metric burden.
Why the study?
Healthcare performance measurement is limited by variability in data sources, definitions, workarounds, overabundant metrics, priority misalignment, and low resources.
Programmatic quality measures aim to streamline quality reporting, align goals, and reduce the burden of overabundant metrics in surgical care.
May ease metric burdens in surgical quality programs; leaves open real-world impact pending prospective validation.
Health care performance metrics are offered predominantly in terms of outcomes, processes, or structural components of health care delivery. However, measurement is limited by variability in data sources, definitions, and workarounds. The American College of Surgeons has recently developed a new type of performance metric known as a "programmatic measure". These metrics align structures, processes, and outcomes to better coordinate quality measurement with support of frontline care teams. In this multifaceted way, these measures differ from current "single" measures such as targeting surgical site infection. The thematic focus of these measures and alignment of structure-resource components to support processes and outcomes also sets these measures apart from contemporary composite measures. Importantly, structural elements of these measures reflect minimum resources required for patient care, addressing staffing and resource barriers felt by local institutions in addressing numerous existing quality metrics. These metrics will streamline quality reporting to improve care navigation for patients. Clinicians will find more appropriately aligned goals and responsibilities, resulting in increased teamwork and communication. These measures are designed to address the current burdens of overabundant metrics, priority misalignment, and low resources in a patient-centric fashion to better align health care quality and measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peters et al. (2024) conducted a review in Surgical quality. Programmatic quality measures vs. Current single or composite measures was evaluated. Programmatic quality measures align structures, processes, and outcomes to streamline quality reporting, improve care navigation, and address the burdens of overabundant metrics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: