Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 29, 2018Annual Review of MedicineOpen Access

What Metrics Accurately Reflect Surgical Quality?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Design

Review

Authors

AIAndrew M. IbrahimJDJustin B. Dimick

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Surgeons should interpret quality metrics cautiously due to case mix and chance; leaves open optimal structure-process-outcome strategies for improvement.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Ibrahim et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70e3188031ec7bb1dca5fbhttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-060116-022805
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Holy Grail of Surgical Quality Improvement: Process Measures or Risk-Adjusted Outcomes?2006 · 18 citations
  2. 2Quality Measurement of Outcome in General Surgery Revisited2002 · 17 citations
  3. 3Defining Quality Metrics for Telemedicine in Surgery: A Critical Examination2026
  4. 4Measuring Processes of Care in General Surgery: Assessment of Technical and Nontechnical Skills2010 · 6 citations
  5. 5The Monitoring and Improvement of Surgical-Outcome Quality2015 · 79 citations