This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Endospore-forming bacteria are an important challenge for the food industry due to their ubiquitous nature, widespread presence in the food chain and sophisticated survival mechanisms. An accurate method is needed that can provide insight into the quality of raw materials, predict spoilage potential and ensure food safety. A plethora of methods exists for the enumeration of spore-forming bacteria which vary among countries, industries and food producers. These methods describe a wide range of values in the key method parameters, such as, heat treatment, growth medium, incubation time, and temperature. Consequently the results obtained can vary leading to mis alignment and confusion. In addition, many of these methods are empirical and have not been validated. A harmonised international approach for the enumeration of spores is needed to provide consistent and reliable results on which to base food safety and quality decisions. A group of experts associated with the Internal Standardisation Organisation working group undertaking this task has identified the main endospore-forming bacterial species occurring in foods based on a wide selection of publications. Endospores are typically formed by bacteria belonging to twelve families originating from the Negativicutes, Bacilli and Clostridia classes, with the latter two being the most important for the food industry. This review will be used as a first step in method standardisation. • Comprehensive overview showing the wide variation of endospore enumeration methods. • Review of recent taxonomic changes of food related endospore-forming bacteria. • Association of relevant endospore-forming bacteria at species level with food categories. • Laying the foundation for the development of an endospore enumeration method.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klijn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: