Key result
Free-breathing exercise CMR proves feasible and detects a ~10% LVEF increase from baseline during exertion.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance image acquisition during exercise typically requires transient cessation of exercise or complex post-processing, potentially compromising clinical utility.
Is a free-breathing, multi-shot, navigated CMR image acquisition technique feasible and reproducible for ventricular volume quantification during continuous exercise?
Observational (n=16)
Is a free-breathing, multi-shot, navigated CMR image acquisition technique feasible and reproducible for ventricular volume quantification during continuous exercise?
A free-breathing, multi-shot, navigated CMR technique allows feasible and highly reproducible simultaneous assessment of left and right ventricular volumes during continuous exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports exercise CMR feasibility for ventricular assessment; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) image acquisition techniques during exercise typically requires either transient cessation of exercise or complex post-processing, potentially compromising clinical utility. We evaluated the feasibility and reproducibility of a navigated image acquisition method for ventricular volumes assessment during continuous physical exercise. Methods: Ten healthy volunteers underwent supine cycle ergometer (Lode) exercise CMR on two separate occasions using a free-breathing, multi-shot, navigated, balanced steady-state free precession cine pulse sequence. Images were acquired at 3-stages, baseline and during steady-state exercise at 55% and 75% maximal heart rate (HRmax), based on a prior supine cardiopulmonary exercise test. Intra-and inter-observer variability and inter-scan reproducibility were derived. Clinical feasibility was tested in a separate cohort of patients with severe mitral regurgitation (n=6). Results: End-diastolic volume (EDV) of both LV and RV decreased during exercise at 55% and 75% HRmax, although a reduction in RVEDV index was only observed at 75% HRmax. Ejection fractions (EF) for both ventricles were significantly higher at 75% HRmax compared to their respective baselines (LVEF 68%±3% vs. 58%±5%, P=0.001; RVEF 66%±4% vs. 58%±7%, P=0.02). Intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility of LV parameters was excellent at all 3-stages. Although measurements of RVESV were more variable during exercise, the reproducibility of both RVEF and RV cardiac index was excellent (CV <10%). Inter-scan LV and RV ejection fraction were highly reproducible at all 3 stages, although inter-scan reproducibility of indexed RVESV was only moderate. The protocol was well tolerated by all patients. Conclusions: Exercise CMR using a free-breathing, multi-shot, navigated cine imaging method allows simultaneous assessment of left and right ventricular volumes during continuous exercise. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were excellent. Inter-scan LV and RV ejection fraction were also highly reproducible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chew et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers and severe mitral regurgitation (n=16). Free-breathing, multi-shot, navigated CMR during continuous exercise vs. Baseline (rest) was evaluated on LVEF at 75% HRmax compared to baseline (p=0.001). Free-breathing, multi-shot, navigated CMR during continuous exercise was feasible and highly reproducible, detecting an increase in LVEF at 75% HRmax compared to baseline (68% vs 58%, P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: