Key result
A new approach using volumetric deformable models and MRI-SPAMM successfully characterized the 3-D shape and motion of the left ventricle and extracted quantitative differences between normal and abnormal hearts.
A new volumetric deformable model applied to MRI-SPAMM can characterize 3-D LV motion and differentiate normal from abnormal hearts.
Supports 3-D LV motion quantification from MRI; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
We present a new approach for the analysis of the left ventricular shape and motion based on the development of a new class of volumetric deformable models. We estimate the deformation and complex motion of the left ventricle (LV) in terms of a few parameters that are functions and whose values vary locally across the LV. These parameters capture the radial and longitudinal contraction, the axial twisting, and the long-axis deformation. Using Lagrangian dynamics and finite-element theory, we convert these volumetric primitives into dynamic models that deform due to forces exerted by the datapoints. We present experiments where we used magnetic tagging (MRI-SPAMM) to acquire datapoints from the LV during systole. By applying our method to MRI-SPAMM datapoints, we were able to characterize the 3-D shape and motion of the LV both locally and globally, in a clinically useful way. In addition, based on the model parameters we were able to extract quantitative differences between normal and abnormal hearts and visualize them in a way that is useful to physicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (1996) studied Left ventricular shape and motion analysis. Volumetric deformable models and MRI-SPAMM was evaluated on 3-D shape and motion of the left ventricle. A new approach using volumetric deformable models and MRI-SPAMM successfully characterized the 3-D shape and motion of the left ventricle and extracted quantitative differences between normal and abnormal hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: