Key result
Translational research over three decades has demonstrated that ACE inhibitors improve clinical outcomes across a broad spectrum of cardiovascular and renal diseases.
The expanded clinical indications for ACE inhibitors over the past three decades highlight the successful cross-fertilization between basic science and clinical medicine in cardiovascular research.
The expanding clinical indications for the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors during the past three decades to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality across a broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases have been the consequence of impressively productive interchanges between basic science and clinical medicine. In some areas, the initial discovery from animal investigations produced the hypotheses that were confirmed and expanded in patients with specific disease processes. In the development of ACE inhibitors, there are also important examples where an unexpected discovery from clinical trials spurred a host of laboratory investigations that uncovered novel mechanisms to underpin the clinical observations. Although developed as an antihypertensive agent, these effective interchanges, termed “translational research,” have collectively produced convincing data to demonstrate that ACE inhibitors can and should be used to slow progression of renal disease, prevent and treat heart failure, attenuate adverse left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction and improve prognosis, reduce atherosclerotic complications in patients with coronary artery disease, and, even more recently, reduce the incidence of Type II diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pfeffer et al. (2006) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors was evaluated. Translational research over three decades has demonstrated that ACE inhibitors improve clinical outcomes across a broad spectrum of cardiovascular and renal diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: