Key result
Modified oscillometric pulse contour method correlates significantly with echocardiography for estimating stroke volume.
Why the study?
Does a modified pulse contour method using an oscillometric sphygmomanometer accurately estimate stroke volume compared to echocardiography in human subjects?
Observational (n=55)
Does a modified pulse contour method using an oscillometric sphygmomanometer accurately estimate stroke volume compared to echocardiography in human subjects?
A modified pulse contour method embedded in an oscillometric sphygmomanometer can estimate stroke volume with acceptable agreement to echocardiography, potentially enabling home monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change clinical stroke volume assessment; leaves open prospective validation of oscillometric estimates.
GOAL: The goal of this study is to present a modified pulse contour method to estimate the stroke volume (SV) based on an oscillometric sphygmomanometer. METHODS: The pulse contour was extracted from the pulse signal of the cuff pressure. The characteristics of the brachial artery, as well as the compliance ( C(artery)) and time constant τ of the Windkessel model, could be determined and used to estimate the SV once the apparatus finished the blood pressure measurement. RESULTS: Assessments of the SV by echocardiography and our method were carried out in 55 subjects. The change in the brachial arterial volume obtained by our method was significantly correlated with that of the two-dimensional ultrasound method (r(v) = 0.871). The estimated SV values by our method for male and female groups, SV(estimate), were also significantly correlated with the echocardiography results, SV(ref) (r(male) = 0.680, r(female) = 0.706 ). The Bland-Altman plot showed agreement between SV(ref) and SV(estimate), with all data points contained within the limits of agreement (± 2 SD). The mean difference and standard deviation (mean ± SD) were 0.101 ± 14.880 ml and 0.650 ± 11.990 ml for the male and female groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The blood pressure, SV, and cardiac output were measured simultaneously, making our method well suited for home use. SIGNIFICANCE: Our method was embedded in an oscillometric sphygmomanometer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2015) reported an observational. Modified pulse contour method (oscillometric sphygmomanometer) vs. Echocardiography was evaluated on Stroke volume estimation correlation with echocardiography (r=0.680 (male), r=0.706 (female)). A modified pulse contour method using an oscillometric sphygmomanometer estimated stroke volume with significant correlation to echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: