Key result
LBBAP links to lead-site myocardial scar and recurrent syncope in a bifascicular block case.
Why the study?
Left bundle branch area pacing is gaining traction, but complications such as septal perforation and lead-related issues may still arise in patients with bifascicular block and recurrent syncope.
Case Report (n=1)
LBBAP can cause localized myocardial scarring at the lead site, and comprehensive workup for syncope is essential to identify non-cardiac causes like orthostatic hypotension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Warrants comprehensive syncope workup including autonomic testing after LBBAP; leaves open the incidence of lead-site scarring.
Background: Conduction system pacing, which includes His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. His bundle pacing, introduced over two decades ago, continues to see growing use, while LBBAP is gaining traction due to its broader target area and shorter procedure times. However, complications such as septal perforation and lead-related issues may still arise. This case report explores the evaluation and management of recurrent syncope in the context of bifascicular block (BFB), highlighting the importance of thorough assessment, continuous ECG monitoring, and the potential need for permanent pacemaker implantation. Case summary: A 60-year-old woman with a history of myocardial infarction, Type II diabetes, and dyslipidaemia presented with recurrent syncope and BFB, for which a LBBAP device was implanted in August 2023. In February 2024, she was admitted again due to recurrent syncope and frequent premature ventricular contractions. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed two localized myocardial scars: one at the basal anterior wall from the 2018 ischaemic event and another in the mid infero-septal wall at the site of the LBBAP lead. During her hospital stay, she experienced multiple episodes of near fainting due to orthostatic hypotension, indicative of underlying autonomic neuropathy. Discussion: This narrative explores the evolving landscape of cardiac pacing techniques, with a focus on LBBAP, highlighting its advantages over traditional methods while also acknowledging potential complications. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive workup for syncope and the need for tailored interventions that extend beyond pacemaker implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Redzepi et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Recurrent syncope and bifascicular block (n=1). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) was evaluated. Left bundle branch area pacing in a 60-year-old woman with bifascicular block was associated with a localized myocardial scar at the lead site and recurrent syncope due to autonomic neuropathy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: