Why the study?
AF management faces challenges due to complex and individualized arrhythmia presentations, suggesting mechanism-based personalized approaches are needed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review emphasizes the integration of animal, clinical, and computational models to understand AF mechanisms and develop personalized management strategies.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common human arrhythmia, affecting millions of patients worldwide. A combination of risk factors and comorbidities results in complex atrial remodeling, which increases AF vulnerability and persistence. Insights from animal models, clinical studies, and computational modeling have advanced the understanding of the mechanisms and pathophysiology of AF. Areas of heterogeneous pathological remodeling, as well as altered electrophysiological properties, serve as a substrate for AF drivers and spontaneous activations. The complex and individualized presentation of this arrhythmia suggests that mechanisms-based personalized approaches will likely be needed to overcome current challenges in AF management. In this paper, we review the insights on the mechanisms of AF obtained from animal models and clinical studies and how computational models integrate this knowledge to advance AF clinical management. We also assess the challenges that need to be overcome to implement these mechanistic models in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinto et al. (2022) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: