Key result
Early idarucizumab reversal for traumatic SDH in dabigatran patients is linked to ~22% favorable outcomes.
Why the study?
Outcomes of treatment for traumatic brain injury in patients on anticoagulants are uncertain, prompting investigation of idarucizumab reversal therapy in elderly patients on dabigatran.
Does idarucizumab improve outcomes in elderly patients with acute traumatic subdural hematoma treated with dabigatran?
Observational (n=23)
Yes
Does idarucizumab improve outcomes in elderly patients with acute traumatic subdural hematoma treated with dabigatran?
In elderly patients with dabigatran-associated traumatic subdural hematoma, early administration of idarucizumab is associated with favorable outcomes, though overall mortality remains high.
Should not yet alter practice in dabigatran-associated subdural hematoma; leaves open efficacy pending randomized trials.
Use of anticoagulants is increasing with the aging of societies. The safe first-line drug is likely to be a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), but outcomes of treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with anticoagulants are uncertain. Therefore, we examined the clinical effect of idarucizumab as reversal therapy in elderly patients with TBI who were treated with dabigatran. A retrospective multi-center observational study was performed in patients ≥65 years of age who developed acute traumatic subdural hematoma during treatment with dabigatran and underwent reversal therapy with idarucizumab. The items examined included patient background, neurological and imaging findings at arrival, course after admission, complications, and outcomes. A total of 23 patients were enrolled in the study. The patients had a mean age of 78.9 years. Cause of TBI was fall in 60.9% of the subjects. Mean Glasgow Coma Scale score at arrival was 8.7; anisocoria was present in 31.8% of cases. Exacerbation of consciousness was found in 30.4%, but only in 13.3% of subjects treated with idarucizumab before consciousness and imaging findings worsened. Dabigatran was discontinued in 81.8% of cases after hematoma development, with a mean withdrawal period of 12.1 days. The favorable outcome rate was 21.7%, and mortality was 39.1%. In multi-variate analysis, timing of idarucizumab administration was associated with a favorable outcome. There were ischemic complications in 3 cases (13.1%), and all three events occurred ≥7 days after administration of idarucizumab. These findings suggest that in cases that develop hematoma during treatment with dabigatran, it is important to administer idarucizumab early and restart dabigatran after conditions stabilize.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suehiro et al. (2023) conducted an observational in acute traumatic subdural hematoma during treatment with dabigatran (n=23). Idarucizumab was evaluated on favorable outcome rate. Idarucizumab reversal in elderly patients with traumatic subdural hematoma on dabigatran yielded a 21.7% favorable outcome rate and 39.1% mortality, with early administration improving outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: