Why the study?
Intracranial hemorrhage is the most deadly bleeding complication of anticoagulation, and the real-world efficacy of idarucizumab for dabigatran-associated ICH is uncertain.
Does idarucizumab improve functional outcomes in patients with dabigatran-associated intracranial hemorrhage?
Does idarucizumab improve functional outcomes in patients with dabigatran-associated intracranial hemorrhage?
In a small real-world cohort, idarucizumab administration for dabigatran-associated intracranial hemorrhage was associated with dismal outcomes, suggesting that its use should be carefully weighed against patients' goals of care.
Poor outcomes persist after idarucizumab reversal in dabigatran ICH; leaves open the need for larger prospective studies on management.
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most deadly bleeding complication associated with anticoagulation. The efficacy of idarucizumab in treating dabigatran-associated ICH in the real world is uncertain. We sought to assess patient outcomes in this sick population. This was a 2-year prospective observational study of functional neurologic status in patients who received idarucizumab following dabigatran-associated ICH across three tertiary Canadian hospitals. The primary outcome was disability on the modified Rankin scale thirty days after antidote administration. Five patients received idarucizumab for dabigatran-associated ICH. The median time to idarucizumab administration was 43 minutes (range: 2–163 minutes). Four patients were dead at 30 days. The fifth patient was in a minimally conscious state with hemiparesis requiring full nursing care. Three patients were transitioned to palliative care based on their advanced directives and dismal prognosis as determined by the treating team. High quality care should not include idarucizumab when it is unlikely to achieve patients’ previously stated goals of care. However, rapid administration of this expensive antidote is often necessary when information is incomplete.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: