Key result
DAPT reduces stroke recurrence ~33% versus monotherapy in acute ischemic stroke or TIA.
Why the study?
Does dual antiplatelet therapy reduce recurrent stroke in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack compared to mono antiplatelet therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=3,766)
Does dual antiplatelet therapy reduce recurrent stroke in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack compared to mono antiplatelet therapy?
Dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduces stroke recurrence and combined vascular events compared to monotherapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA, with a non-significant trend toward increased major bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce early recurrence in acute ischemic stroke or TIA; reinforces meta-analytic evidence for guideline-directed use.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antiplatelets are recommended for patients with acute noncardioembolic stroke or transient ischemic attack. We compared the safety and efficacy of dual versus mono antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. METHODS: Completed randomized controlled trials of dual versus mono antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute (≤3 days) ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack were identified using electronic bibliographic searches. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, unknown; fatal, nonfatal). Comparison of binary outcomes between treatment groups was analyzed with random effect models and described using risk ratios (95% CI). RESULTS: Twelve completed randomized trials involving 3766 patients were included. In comparison with mono antiplatelet therapy, dual therapy (aspirin+dipyridamole and aspirin+clopidogrel) significantly reduced stroke recurrence, dual 58 (3.3%) versus mono 91 (5.0%; risk ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.93); composite vascular event (stroke, myocardial infarction, vascular death), dual 74 (4.4%) versus mono 106 (6%; risk ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-0.99); and the combination of stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, and all death, dual 100 (1.7%) versus mono 136 (9.1%; risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.91); dual therapy was also associated with a nonsignificant trend to increase major bleeding, dual 15 (0.9%) versus mono 6 (0.4%; risk ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 0.86-5.06). CONCLUSIONS: Dual antiplatelet therapy appears to be safe and effective in reducing stroke recurrence and combined vascular events in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack as compared with mono therapy. These results need to be tested in prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geeganage et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=3,766). Dual antiplatelet therapy vs. Mono antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Recurrent stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, unknown; fatal, nonfatal) (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.93). Dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced stroke recurrence compared with mono therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA (3.3% vs 5.0%; RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.49-0.93).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: