Key result
Anatomical isthmus block is linked to a 95% pseudo-focal atrial tachycardia termination rate versus breakthrough ablation.
Why the study?
Human atrial layers can bypass each other and cause centrifugal propagation, but the anatomical substrates, electrophysiological properties, and ablation outcomes of pseudo-focal macroreentrant ATs were not well characterized.
Does blocking the anatomical isthmus improve termination compared to ablating the breakthrough site in patients with pseudo-focal atrial tachycardias?
Observational (n=22)
Does blocking the anatomical isthmus improve termination compared to ablating the breakthrough site in patients with pseudo-focal atrial tachycardias?
Absolute Event Rate: 95% vs 20%
p-value: p=< .001
In pseudo-focal atrial tachycardias, blocking the anatomical isthmus is significantly more effective for achieving termination than ablating the breakthrough site.
May support isthmus block in pseudo-focal AT; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: Human atria comprise distinct layers. One layer can bypass another, and lead to a downstream centrifugal propagation at their interface. We sought to characterize anatomical substrates, electrophysiological properties, and ablation outcomes of "pseudo-focal" atrial tachycardias (ATs), defined as macroreentrant ATs mimicking focal ATs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed left atrial ATs showing centrifugal propagation with postpacing intervals (PPIs) after entrainment pacing suggestive of a macroreentrant mechanism. A total of 22 patients had pseudo-focal ATs consisting of 15 perimitral and 7 roof-dependent flutters. A low-voltage area was consistently found at the collision site and colocalized with distinct anatomical structures like the: (1) coronary sinus-great cardiac vein bundle (27%), (2) vein of Marshall bundle (18%), (3) Bachmann bundle (27%), (4) septopulmonary bundle (18%), and (5) fossa ovalis (9%). The mean missing tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 65 ± 31 ms (22%) on the endocardial activation map. PPI was 0 [0-15] ms and 0 [0-21] ms longer than TCL at the breakthrough site and the opposite site, respectively. While feasible in 21 pseudo-focal ATs (95%), termination was better achieved by blocking the anatomical isthmus than ablating the breakthrough site [20/21 (95%) vs. 1/5 (20%); p < .001]. CONCLUSION: Perimitral and roof-dependent flutters with centrifugal propagation are favored by a low-voltage area located at well-identified anatomical structures. Comprehensive entrainment pacing maneuvers are crucial to distinguish pseudo-focal ATs from true focal ATs. Blocking the anatomical isthmus is a better therapeutic option than ablating the breakthrough site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakatani et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Pseudo-focal atrial tachycardias (n=22). Blocking the anatomical isthmus vs. Ablating the breakthrough site was evaluated on Termination of tachycardia (p=< .001). Blocking the anatomical isthmus achieved significantly higher termination rates of pseudo-focal atrial tachycardias compared to ablating the breakthrough site (95% vs 20%; p < .001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: