Key result
Hypertensive heart disease links to impaired LV GLS and LA strain, worsening with declining LVEF.
Why the study?
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with strain analysis improve the detection of atrioventricular dysfunction in patients with hypertensive heart disease compared to healthy controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=85)
No
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with strain analysis improve the detection of atrioventricular dysfunction in patients with hypertensive heart disease compared to healthy controls?
p-value: p=<0.001
CMR-derived myocardial strain parameters reveal subclinical left atrial and ventricular dysfunction in hypertensive heart disease even when ejection fraction is preserved, offering a more sensitive tool for risk stratification.
May aid subclinical dysfunction detection in hypertensive heart disease; leaves open prospective validation for risk stratification.
Previous studies on hypertensive heart disease (HHD) mainly focused on the alterations of left ventricle (LV), with insufficient comprehensive evaluation of left atria (LA), right atria (RA) and right ventricle (RV). This study assesses atrial and ventricular morphology, function, and mechanics in HHD using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. This study enrolled 64 HHD patients grouped by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): ≤30% (n = 23), 30% < LVEF < 50% (n = 20), and ≥ 50% (n = 21), as well as 21 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. LAEF parameters were calculated from phasic volume measurements. Atrial global longitudinal strain (GLS) parameters were acquired from the GLS-time curve, which includes reservoir function (total strain, εs), conduit function (passive strain, εe), and booster pump function (active strain, εa). Meanwhile, all other parameters were derived from CMR cine images using CVI42 software. In HHD, LA parameters (LAEFtotal, LAEFpassive, LAεS and LAεe) were lower than in controls (p < 0.05). Regarding RV alterations, LVEF ≤ 30% and 30% < LVEF < 50% groups had significantly lower RVEF, global circumferential strain (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS) than the LVEF ≥ 50% and control groups (p < 0.05). RA morphology and function showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). RA total and passive strain were lower in the LVEF ≤ 30% group than in LVEF ≥ 50% and controls (p < 0.05). Chamber morphology, function, and mechanics vary across HHD stages. Strain parameters may offer more reliable risk stratification than traditional metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niu et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertensive heart disease (n=85). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) (p=<0.001). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed that left ventricular global longitudinal strain and left atrial strain parameters were significantly impaired in patients with hypertensive heart disease compared to healthy controls, worsening with declining ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: