Key result
Losartan-based therapy resulted in greater regression of ECG left ventricular hypertrophy by Cornell product (-200 vs -69 mm.ms, P<0.001) than atenolol-based therapy at 6 months.
Why the study?
Does losartan-based therapy improve regression of ECG LVH compared to atenolol-based therapy in hypertensive patients with ECG LVH?
Population
9,193 hypertensive patients with ECG LVH by Sokolow-Lyon voltage or Cornell voltage-duration product…
Comparison
Blinded losartan-based therapy evaluated at 6… vs Blinded atenolol-based therapy evaluated at 6…
Design
RCT, blinded
Follow-up
up to 5 years
Authors
Loading...
Losartan-based therapy should be prioritized over atenolol for ECG LVH regression in hypertension; confirms ARB superiority independent of BP reduction.
RCT (n=9,193)
Blinded
Does losartan-based therapy improve regression of ECG LVH compared to atenolol-based therapy in hypertensive patients with ECG LVH?
Absolute Event Rate: -200% vs -69%
p-value: p=<0.001
Losartan-based therapy is superior to atenolol-based therapy for regressing electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients, independent of blood pressure reduction.
Okin et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in Hypertension with ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (n=9,193). Losartan-based therapy vs. Atenolol-based therapy was evaluated on Regression of ECG left ventricular hypertrophy by Cornell voltage-duration product at 6 months (p=<0.001). Losartan-based therapy resulted in greater regression of ECG left ventricular hypertrophy by Cornell product (-200 vs -69 mm.ms, P<0.001) than atenolol-based therapy at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: