Why the study?
Several clinical trials have proved the inferiority of dual-chamber pacing for sinus node disease compared to nonphysiological single-chamber ventricular back-up pacing, prompting consideration of alternative right atrial pacing sites.
Does low interatrial septal pacing reduce P-wave duration and prevent atrial arrhythmias in a patient with sick sinus syndrome and complete Bachmann's bundle block?
Does low interatrial septal pacing reduce P-wave duration and prevent atrial arrhythmias in a patient with sick sinus syndrome and complete Bachmann's bundle block?
In a patient with sick sinus syndrome and complete Bachmann's bundle block, low interatrial septal pacing reduced P-wave duration and PR interval but did not prevent subsequent atrial arrhythmias.
Low interatrial septal pacing shortened P-wave/PR intervals without preventing arrhythmias in one case; leaves open efficacy in sick sinus syndrome.
INTRODUCTION: A dual-chamber pacemaker (DDD/R) for a sinus node disease is sometimes referred to as a physiological pacemaker as it maintains atrioventricular synchrony, however several clinical trials have proved its inferiority to a nonphysiological single-chamber ventricular back-up pacing. PATIENT CONCERNS: A subject of the study is a 74-year-old woman with a sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and a previously implanted physiological DDD/R pacemaker. The SSS was diagnosed because of patient's very slow sinus rhythm of about 36 bpm, and due to several episodes of dizziness. After the DDD/R implantation the percentage of atrial pacing approached 100%, with almost none ventricular pacing. DIAGNOSES: Sick sinus syndrome, complete Bachmann's bundle block, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was previously implanted with a physiological DDD/R pacemaker. Several years after the implantation, the atrial fibrillation was diagnosed and the pulmonary vein isolation was then performed by cryoablation. During the follow-up after pulmonary vein isolation, the improvement of mitral filling parameters was assessed using echocardiography. Shortly thereafter the patient developed the persistent paroxysm of a typical atrial flutter which was successfully terminated using a radiofrequency ablation. No recurrence thereof has been observed ever since (24 months). OUTCOMES: The atrial electrode of the pacing system was implanted within the low interatrial septal region that resulted in a reduced P-wave duration compared to native sinus rhythm P-waves. The said morphology was deformed because of the complete Bachmann bundle block. That approach, despite a nonphysiological direction of an atrial activation, yielded relatively short P-waves (paced P-wave: 179 ms vs intrinsic sinus P-wave: 237 ms). It also contributed to a significantly shorter PR interval (paced PR: 204 ms vs sinus rhythm PR: 254 ms). CONCLUSIONS: The authors took into consideration different aspects of alternative right atrial pacing sites. This report has shown that in some patients with a sinus node disease, low interatrial septal pacing can reduce the P-wave duration but does not prevent from the development of atrial arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mercik et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: