Key result
Sulodexide cuts CV events ~49% vs control in patients with vascular disease.
Why the study?
The association between sulodexide and cardiovascular outcomes and adverse events in patients with macrovascular and microvascular disease was investigated.
Does sulodexide reduce myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality in patients with vascular disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=8,436)
Does sulodexide reduce myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality in patients with vascular disease?
Effect estimate: OR 0.51 (95% CI 0.41-0.73)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Sulodexide significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality in patients with macrovascular disease, without significantly increasing bleeding or gastrointestinal adverse events.
Supports adding sulodexide in vascular disease to reduce CV events and death; reinforces meta-analytic evidence from prior trials.
Background and Objectives: Among patients with macrovascular and microvascular disease, we investigated the association between sulodexide and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and adverse events. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) reporting CV outcomes and adverse events in patients with vascular disease receiving sulodexide for any indication versus control. The following outcomes were investigated: any CV event, myocardial infarction, CV death, bleeding events and gastrointestinal symptoms. Results: Twelve studies with a total of 8,436 patients were included. Sulodexide resulted in a significant reduction in CV events (OR 0.51 [95% confidence interval 0.41-0.73]; p<0.0001) and CV death (OR 0.63 [CI 0.48-0.81]; p = 0.0004). This effect was mainly related to a lower risk of CV events (OR 0.55, CI 0.41-0.73) and CV death (OR 0.60, CI 0.45-0.79) in the macrovascular disease arm. Similarly, patients with macrovascular disease on sulodexide had significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction (OR 0.68 CI 0.50-0.94; p = 0.02) compared to control. The effects of sulodexide were nonsignificant among patients with microvascular disease in terms of overall CV event, myocardial infarction and mortality reduction. The risk of bleeding and gastrointestinal adverse events was not significantly different between sulodexide and control. Conclusion: Sulodexide has a beneficial effect among patients with macrovascular disease in terms of reducing the risk for MI, overall CV mortality and CV events. Larger RCTs are needed to corroborate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reyes et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Vascular disease (macrovascular and microvascular) (n=8,436). Sulodexide vs. Control (placebo or no treatment) was evaluated on Cardiovascular events (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41-0.73, p=<0.0001). Sulodexide significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular events (OR 0.51) and cardiovascular death (OR 0.63) compared to control in patients with vascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: